Project 2025 Tracker / What’s done, what’s next

13. Environmental Protection Agency · Minor

Align EPA radiation standards with NRC, DOE, and DOT standards

Not started

Printed page 427 13. Environmental Protection Agency

“Assess and update the agency’s radiation standards so that they align with those of other agencies, including the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Department of Energy, and Department of Transportation, as well as international standards.”

What has happened

  1. Not started

    EPA's radiation standards have not been assessed or updated. What the agency did do with its counterparts is narrower: with the Department of Energy, the Department of War and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission it issued Revision 2 of the Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual, the first update since 2001 — a shared method for surveying contaminated soil and building surfaces, not a shared dose standard. The limits in 40 CFR parts 190 and 191 are unchanged.

Research log

What was searched, and what didn’t count as evidence

Research notes

  • The one multi-agency radiation document of the window is a methods manual, not a standard. MARSSIM tells surveyors how to demonstrate compliance with a cleanup criterion; EPA’s radiation standards are the dose limits at 40 CFR parts 190 and 191 and the protective action guides, and none of those was reopened.
  • Progress is measured on this ask, not on an adjacent document, so the manual sits on the not started event as Evidence rather than moving the Status. It is the closest thing on the record and a reader should see it.
  • Negative search (2026-08-27): among the EPA Federal Register notices we keep and search, one radiation document falls in the window, the MARSSIM notice; among the EPA final and proposed rules we keep and search, none does.
  • Unified Agenda, read 2026-09-01. We read EPA’s full Unified Agenda on reginfo.gov (214 entries across the active, long-term and completed stages), because the Federal Register prints only the entries that need a Regulatory Flexibility analysis, and the 2026-08-27 negative was taken from that abbreviated version. No entry anywhere in the 214 mentions radiation. The negative reaches the agenda as well as the Federal Register.
Action
other
Object
EPA radiation standards
ID
1099