22. Department of the Treasury · Minor
Conduct a thorough review of IRS information technology contracts
Printed page 700 22. Department of the Treasury
“A thorough review of IT contracts should be conducted.”
What has happened
- Partially done
TIGTA's own review of a defined class of IRS information-technology contracts, which is the closest thing on the record to the Quote's object examined on its own terms. Its objective was to "evaluate the exit strategies between the IRS and its cloud service providers"; it attempted to review 61 cloud-managed contracts, found the IRS could not locate 19 of them, and found that of the 42 it could review, "35 (83 percent) contracts did not fully address elements of an exit strategy". Read alongside the March 2025 audit of Inflation Reduction Act information-technology contracts — where "the IRS was unable to locate a complete list of contracts associated with the 74 legacy systems we selected" and TIGTA estimated roughly $21 million of modernization funding spent inappropriately on legacy operations and maintenance — the picture is of the reviews being done by the Inspector General rather than by the Administration, and of contract records that could not support a thorough one.
- Partially done
A review of the IRS's contracts was conducted, and information technology was the largest part of it. Under the Defend the Spend initiative the IRS began evaluating its contract portfolio in February 2025: "As of January 2025, the IRS had over 3,000 active contracts. In response to the executive orders, the IRS identified 501 contracts for potential cancellation by May 2025 on its Procurement Hub … by July 2025, the IRS opted to cancel 344 of those contracts." The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration audited the result and found the IT business unit both the largest source of cancellations and the largest saving: "The Information Technology business unit had the most contracts cancelled, with 133 (41 percent) contracts of the 322 total cancelled contracts … almost $300 million in avoided costs and almost $100 million in open obligations", plus 27 of the 61 descoped contracts. `partial` and not `done` on the word *thorough*: this was a spending sweep run from a list the General Services Administration supplied, not an examination of IT contracting on its merits, TIGTA found "the actual cost savings from these actions were either limited or unknown", and it separately found the underlying records incomplete — the IRS "could not locate 19 (31 percent)" of its 61 cloud-managed contracts, and could not produce a complete contract list for a sample of 74 legacy systems.
Research log
What was searched, and what didn’t count as evidence
Research notes
Queries: the IRS sitemap (12 pages, 57,110 URLs) for contract|procurement|information technology review pages; the Treasury press and statements indexes 2025 and 2026 for IRS|information technology|contract; Federal Register full text; the enrolled text of Public Law 119-75 division E.
Read-queue ticket 07, 2026-09-06 — tigta.gov swept, and the route is worth writing down because the
obvious ones lie. tigta.gov/reports/audit, tigta.gov/reports/all-reports and
tigta.gov/sitemap.xml all answer HTTP 200 with a page titled “Page not found” — the site is on an
interim platform and says so in a banner on every page. The live index is tigta.gov/reports/list,
whose markup is an empty shell; its loader script fetches
https://www.tigta.gov/reports/all-reports.json, which is the machine-readable index: 153 reports
from 2024-10-15 to 2026-09-01, each with date, report number, type, title and PDF path under
tigta.gov/sites/default/files/reports/. That is the route; guessing a report number is not.
Completeness control: TIGTA’s Semiannual Report to Congress for 2025-10-01 to 2026-03-31 states that
its audit and evaluation offices “issued 17 reports” in the period, and the JSON index carries 18
numbered reports across that window. oversight.gov, which TIGTA’s banner points at for older
reports, is behind a JavaScript antibot wall and could not be used.
The index was grepped for information technology|modernization| IT |contract|cloud|cyber|software|technology,
returning ten reports, of which four are on IT contracting or contracting generally. A fifth,
2025-108-052 of 2025-09-16, is the complement and not a match — it audits a sample of 28
non-information-technology IRA contracts totalling about $309 million, and found that “all 28
contracts in our sample were lacking required documentation”.
A judgment worth flagging. Two of the three instruments above are Inspector General products, and Chapter 21’s own ticket-02 judgment call holds that an IG audit is not the Administration reviewing itself. That call is respected here: the rung rests on the Defend the Spend review, which the IRS ran, and the TIGTA reports are cited for what they record about it and for bounding how thorough it was. If a reviewer disagrees and reads the whole thing as IG activity, this returns to not started with the same three documents attached under §3b rule 4.
- Action
- other
- Object
- IRS information technology contracts
- ID
- 1949