Project 2025 Tracker / What’s done, what’s next

15. Department of Housing and Urban Development · Notable · Needs Congress

Legislate state and local flexibility against federal zoning preemption

Partially done

Printed page 511 15. Department of Housing and Urban Development

“It is essential that legislation provides states and localities maximal flexibility to pursue locally designed policies and minimize the likelihood of federal preemption of local land use and zoning decisions.”

What has happened

  1. Partially done

    The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act writes the non-preemption principle into statute three times and adds local flexibility in a fourth place, but only within the programs it creates. Section 107 directs HUD's Assistant Secretary for Policy Development and Research to publish guidelines and best practices for state and local zoning frameworks, then provides that nothing in the section "may be construed to permit" HUD to take an adverse action against a State or locality that declines to adopt them, and abolishes the Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse. Section 205 provides that nothing in it authorizes the Secretary "to mandate, supersede, or preempt any local zoning or land use policy", and § 103 that nothing in it preempts a State or local building code. Section 503 gives Continuum of Care recipients a route to waive the McKinney-Vento expenditure cap on the strength of "local needs and circumstances". This is legislation minimizing preemption inside new federal programs, not the general guarantee the Quote asks for, and the bills that would go further — the Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act (H.R. 1609, H.R. 1769, S. 1174) — were referred to committee and went no further.

Research log

What was searched, and what didn’t count as evidence

Research notes

  • Boundary: an alternative reading treats §§ 103(f), 107(e) and 205(c)(1) as ordinary rules of construction that preserve the status quo rather than deliver the ask, which would leave this at not started with the Local Zoning Decisions Protection Act named in the note.
  • The same Act cuts the other way in places: §§ 202, 205, 209 and 213 pay states and localities to reform zoning codes and permitting, which is federal money steering local land use even though it cannot compel it.
Action
restrict
Object
federal preemption of local land use and zoning decisions
ID
1434