Project 2025 Tracker / What’s done, what’s next

26. Trade · Minor · Contested — excluded from counts

Eliminate U.S. dependence on Chinese national-security supply chains

Partially done

Printed page 790 26. Trade · from “The Case for Fair Trade”

“Systematically reduce and eventually eliminate any U.S. dependence on Communist Chinese supply chains that may be used to threaten national security such as medicines, silicon chips, rare earth minerals, computer motherboards, flatscreen displays, and military components.”

What has happened

  1. Partially done

    EO 14415 is the closest instrument to the Quote's actual words - securing defense supply chains and domestic acquisition of critical materials, which is the "military components" and "rare earth minerals" end of the list. Computer motherboards and flatscreen displays have no instrument of their own. This is a directive plus several documented implementing actions, which is `partial` under playbook 3; `done` would need the dependence gone.

  2. Partially done

    Two more of the Quote's named categories were addressed on one day by section 232 proclamations - semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and processed critical minerals and their derivatives, the statutory route to rare earths. Tariffs raise the cost of the dependence rather than ending it, and both proclamations are worldwide rather than aimed at China.

  3. Partially done

    Medicines, the first item on the Quote's list, got a dedicated instrument: EO 14336 directs the filling of a Strategic Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Reserve. A stockpile reduces exposure; it does not eliminate the dependence.

  4. Attempted

    The America First Trade Policy memorandum opens the program, recording that the first-term administration "reduced our Nation's dependence on other countries to meet our key security needs" and directing reviews of trade and economic relations with the PRC. It sets reviews running; it changes nothing by itself.

Research log

What was searched, and what didn’t count as evidence

Research notes

An open-ended “eliminate all X” ask, leveled on the playbook 3 rule for that shape: a government-wide directive is attempted, directive plus at least one documented implementing action is partial, and done needs the named object gone or an allowlisted statement that the sweep is complete. There is no such statement.

Further implementing actions in the same program, read but not separately evidenced because they repeat the reading above: EO 14241 (2025-03-20, immediate measures to increase American mineral production), EO 14285 (2025-04-24, offshore critical minerals), EO 14272 (2025-04-15, section 232 actions on processed critical minerals) and the section 232 proclamations on pharmaceuticals (2026-04-02) and polysilicon (2026-08-06).

Action
eliminate
Object
U.S. dependence on Chinese supply chains
ID
2086