Project 2025 Tracker / What’s done, what’s next

16. Department of the Interior · Notable

Reinstate the Trump ESA critical habitat rules

Partially done

Printed page 524 16. Department of the Interior

“Rescind the Biden rules and reinstate the Trump rules regarding: … 2. The Endangered Species Act rules defining Critical Habitat and Critical Habitat Exclusions”

What has happened

  1. Partially done

    The exclusions half is final. FWS's rule revising the §4(b)(2) regulations "articulate[s] when and how we determine whether the benefits of excluding an area outweigh the benefits of designating the area as critical habitat" — the substance of the December 2020 Trump exclusions rule that the 2024 Biden rules had rescinded. The other half is not: the proposed rule on listing and designating critical habitat, which carries the definition of habitat and the not-prudent criteria, was still a proposal on 2026-08-27. SO 3418 §4(c) had directed the review that produced both.

  2. Attempted

    The Fish and Wildlife Service proposed four ESA rules on one day, two of them the ones this Quote names: "Regulations for Designating Critical Habitat" (the §4(b)(2) exclusion analysis) and "Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat" (the designation criteria, including when designation is not prudent and how unoccupied habitat is treated). Proposals only.

Research log

What was searched, and what didn’t count as evidence

Research notes

Two Trump 2020 rules are named: the exclusions rule under ESA §4(b)(2) and the rule defining critical habitat and when designation is not prudent. One is back; the other is a proposal. #1503 owns the statutory-amendment trail for the same page.

Action
reinstate
Object
Endangered Species Act rules defining Critical Habitat and Critical Habitat Exclusions
ID
1477