Project 2025 Tracker / What’s done, what’s next

21. Department of Commerce · Minor

Review Census Bureau financial management, IT, and HR systems

Not started

Printed page 679 21. Department of Commerce

“The new Administration must immediately conduct a review to identify ways to better control costs and reverse recent failures of investments intended to upgrade the financial management, information technology, and human resources systems of the Census Bureau.”

What has happened

  1. Not started

    Moved nearby, and by the wrong actor. All three systems the Quote names have been reviewed inside the window — and every one of those reviews is independent oversight rather than the Administration's own. **Financial management**: the Commerce Inspector General opened an audit on 2025-01-30 (report 2025-510) "to assess the Department's efforts to transition Census Bureau financial operations to the Business Applications Solution". **Information technology**: GAO reported on 2026-06-04 that the Bureau had fully implemented leading practices for risk management on its Enterprise Data Lake modernization and that its cost estimate was reliable, but that its schedule was "not comprehensive, well-constructed, credible, or updated regularly"; the OIG opened an audit of the Bureau's enterprise cybersecurity support contract on 2026-02-03 (report 2026-531). **Human resources**: the OIG found on 2025-02-12 that the Bureau "does not have effective strategies to address staffing gaps and high vacancies in field representative positions" (OIG-25-013-I), and on 2025-09-16 that it had not finalized its staffing plan for the 2026 Census Test (OIG-25-030-A). None of these is the Administration conducting a review to control costs and reverse failed investments; an Inspector General's audit and a GAO engagement identify problems and recommend, and the Quote asks the Department to act. The Bureau's own in-window rulemakings are seven pieces of regulatory housekeeping — boundary-change cutoff dates, the official seal, population-estimate challenges, personal-census-data language, the release of decennial population information, special census services and the age-search fee — none of which touches its business systems.

Research log

What was searched, and what didn’t count as evidence

Research notes

Cluster negative search CENSUS-1 (chapter log): a jq pass over all 83 in-window Federal Register records whose agency is the Census Bureau — every information-collection notice, every deregulatory rule and every 2030 Census operational notice — plus the DOC/CENSUS slice of reginfo.gov’s Unified Agenda (seven RINs: boundary-date, seal, population-estimate-challenge, decennial-release, personal-data and fee housekeeping), plus grep -i census over nominations.ndjson (0 records) and over presidential-actions.ndjson (0). Also Federal Register full text since 2025-01-20 for "Census Bureau" "information technology", "financial management" restricted to the Commerce Department slug, and "Census Bureau" review.

Commerce OIG and GAO were recorded as unreadable. Both were re-measured on 2026-09-05 (read-queue ticket 02 round 2) and both are readable. gao.gov answers 200 to the full browser header set for products, assets and the agency index; what is broken is enumeration, so the route is www.gao.gov/agencies → https://www.gao.gov/agencies/us-census-bureau (six products) and /agencies/department-commerce (eleven), never a guessed slug. www.oig.doc.gov opens — the bare hostname does not resolve and the old Pages/home.aspx path 404s — publishes a 2,842-URL sitemap, and offers a working filtered search at www.oig.doc.gov/reports/?keywords=<term>, control-tested against a nonsense term that returns nothing.

  • Judgment call, recorded in docs/research/ch-21.md: the reviews found are an Inspector General’s and GAO’s. The Quote’s actor is “the new Administration”, and oversight of an agency is not the agency reviewing itself, so these carry Evidence on a not started event under §3b’s moved-nearby device rather than climbing the ladder. A reader should be able to see that the systems were examined and that the Department was not the one examining them.
Action
other
Object
Census Bureau financial management, IT, and HR systems
ID
1885